According to HotHardware, Epic Games is facing major backlash from Fortnite players over its new Sidekick pets feature. These customizable companions cost between 1,000 and 1,500 V-Bucks, which translates to roughly $9 to $18 real money. The customization choices like fur color, patterns, and outfits are locked in permanently before purchase, meaning players can’t change their pets later without buying entirely new ones. A Reddit post protesting the system has gained over 4,000 upvotes, with players calling the pricing “disgusting” greed. This controversy hits Fortnite’s massive player base of over 2 million daily active users who regularly spend money on cosmetics.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
<h2 id="why-players-are-mad”>Why This Feels Different
Here’s the thing about Fortnite‘s cosmetic economy – players are used to spending money. They drop cash on skins, emotes, and accessories constantly. But this Sidekick system crosses a line that even battle-hardened cosmetic buyers find frustrating. The permanent customization lock is what really stings. Imagine spending $18 on a pet, then realizing you don’t like the color combination you chose. Tough luck – you’re stuck with it unless you want to shell out another $18.
And that pricing? It’s sneaky. The 1,000 V-Buck minimum purchase means most people will need to buy two packs just to afford one pet. So even if a Sidekick costs 1,200 V-Bucks, you’re spending $18 instead of just paying the exact amount. It’s the same old mobile game tactic that makes everything cost more than it seems.
Epic’s Risky Bet
Now, Epic probably thought players would eat this up. Customizable pets? That sounds like a goldmine. But they misjudged how much players value flexibility in their purchases. When you buy a skin in Fortnite, you can usually mix and match it with other items. This permanent lock feels like a step backward.
I can’t help but wonder if Epic is testing the waters here. If players accept this model, what’s next? Permanent weapon skins? Locked-in character customization? This could set a dangerous precedent for how cosmetics work in the game going forward.
The Reddit Rebellion
The Reddit thread that’s gained thousands of upvotes shows this isn’t just a few angry players. The top comment calls the system “disgusting” greed that shouldn’t be rewarded. And you know what? They’re right. When your most dedicated fans – the people who regularly open their wallets for your game – start organizing boycotts, you’ve messed up.
But here’s the real question: will it matter? Fortnite has millions of players, and 4,000 upvotes represents a tiny fraction. The real test will be whether the broader player base actually votes with their wallets. History shows that outrage often fades when shiny new things hit the item shop.
What Happens Now?
Basically, Epic has two choices here. They can stick to their guns and hope the controversy blows over, or they can adjust the system. Maybe make customization changeable after purchase. Perhaps lower the price point. The smart move would be listening to the community that’s made Fortnite such a massive success.
Look, I get that Epic needs to make money. But there’s a difference between profitable and predatory. This Sidekick system, with its permanent locks and sneaky pricing, feels like it’s leaning toward the latter. And in a game that relies on keeping players happy and spending, that’s a risky gamble to take.
