DOE Cancels $7.5B in Clean Energy Projects Across 16 States

Major Clean Energy Funding Withdrawn

The Department of Energy has announced the cancellation of 321 clean energy awards totaling $7.56 billion in funding. The decision, announced Wednesday night, affects projects across multiple energy programs and represents one of the largest single withdrawals of clean energy funding in recent history.

Affected States and Projects

While the Department of Energy has not released a complete list of the 223 affected projects, California Governor Gavin Newsom confirmed that one significant cancellation includes $1.2 billion for the state’s hydrogen hub, known as the Alliance for Renewable Clean Hydrogen Energy Systems.

The affected states include:

  • California
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Minnesota
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • New York
  • Oregon
  • Vermont
  • Washington

Political Context and Timing

Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, confirmed the cancellations in a social media post, stating that “the Left’s climate agenda is being cancelled.” All 16 affected states voted for Kamala Harris in the last presidential election, and most have Democratic leadership at the state level.

The Department of Energy noted that 26% of the canceled awards were granted between Election Day and Inauguration Day in January. The original funding came from multiple DOE offices including Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, Clean Energy Demonstrations, and Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy programs.

Appeal Process and Legal Precedent

Award recipients have 30 days to appeal the cancellation decision. This follows a pattern of similar actions by the current administration, which canceled $3.7 billion worth of clean energy and manufacturing awards in May.

The administration’s approach to clean energy funding has prompted numerous legal challenges. Previous court rulings have been mixed, with one federal district court calling similar EPA actions “arbitrary and capricious,” while an appellate court upheld the government’s right to cancel contracts as part of proper oversight.

Broader Policy Implications

This decision reflects the administration’s continued focus on reshaping energy policy. Recent actions include restricting the use of terms like “climate change” and “emissions” within the Department of Energy, and previous large-scale cancellations affecting various industries from metal manufacturing to power plant operations.

As reported by our monitoring division, several award recipients have already initiated appeals against the recent DOE cancellations, setting the stage for potential legal battles over the future of clean energy funding in the United States.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *